Rating Reviewed by: jbangelfish(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date March 8, 2003Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for 3 Months to 1 year Visitors rate this review 1.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 1 of 5
Price Paid:
$375.00
from ebay Summary: I've had this preamp for about 5 months and continue to be very pleased with it's performance. As others have mentioned, it is Class A rated and John Curl designed. He must be good. It does everything that I want it to do and even with no tone controls, does not seem to miss anything. You don't know that it's there and I think that's what we're looking for. At ten years old it seems to work just as well as new, remote and all. I doubt that I could have done better for $375. Strengths: Stylish, remote compatible, nice compact size and great sound. Weaknesses: Lack of phono stage but this enables the user to incorporate a really nice phono stage. I've got a tube Cary and am extremely pleased with this combination. Similar Products Used: Crown IC150, Accuphase 202, Onkyo. The Crown and Accuphase were great preamps but I'm 50 and getting lazy so I like the remote.
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Colin Ezrow(Unregistered User)
( an Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date November 22, 1998Overall Rating
5 of 5
|
|  | |
Review 2 of 5 Summary: I have had the PLD-2000 in my system for about a year now and it still continues to impress me. Like the other reveiwers here, I purchased mine for $750 from my local Parasound dealer. This preamp is a Class A, dual mono design with balanced and single ended inputs and outputs and is well built with high quality internal parts. I use the RCA connections and get great sound from them, and I've not been able to demo balanced gear at home so I can't comment on those connections. Speaking of the sound, it is clean and detailed with a wide and deep soundstage. The individual images presented have their own "space" and do not move about the stage, unless the recording moves them. The PLD-200 has an accurate tonal balance and neutral, if somewhat laidback presentation, which is a benefit when CD is the main source, as in my system. This quality mates well with the rest of my system and gives me most of what the high quality presentation of recorded music is all about. I have to agree with Mr. DeVito from the earlier review that the direct input/output has a distict edge in sound quality over the others, but the normal inputs sound as good as any of the other $1500 preamps I've heard(I'll not name brands, listen for yourself). This preamp is a great value at its original price and a steal at its' closeout price. Parasound once again deserves thanks for providing high quality, excellent sounding products at reasonable prices. I would have given the PLD-2000 five stars when it was $1500, but at $750 it is a sure thing. If you get a chance to hear one before they're gone, do it and you will hear a fine preamp at an extraordinary price.
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jonathan De Vito(Unregistered User)
( an Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date November 17, 1998Overall Rating
4 of 5
|
|  | |
Review 3 of 5 Summary: I have owned the Parasound PL/D-2000 pre-amplifier for more than 9 months now. I haven't tried everything yet, but my opinion of it is it's somewhat like a Lambhorgini race car. Very fast, but not good for getting the groceries. Let me explain. I think the looks are stunning in that it looks like a pre-amp, feels like a pre-amp, works like a pre-amp -- great. Any quibbles? I would like an equally stunning looking remote, but that's it. If it is so good why did Parasound discontinue it. Well, it has one flaw, it uses a Direct Input technology. What's that? One input is privileged like all get-out, it can be single-ended or balanced with a flick of a switch, just as the output can. All other inputs are ordinary and sound ordinary, too. And that is the rub.
It was reviewed in Fi magazine and compared to $8000.00 tube pre-amps and it did not fare too badly either. I can't use the balanced topology, so I am not getting the most out of it, like not using premium gas for a race car. I recently moved it out of my main system to my office system sans speakers. Using headphones, its transparency is so apparent, and unlike a tube pre-amp, the bass is transparent, too. I hook it up to the top-notch Audiolab 8000T tuner and I can't keep myself from playing the air piano along with the music. Switch to the other inputs, good tonal balance, non-fatiguing, but no magic and rather flat. What gives? I hate non-direct inputs! Well, I have too many great sources: CD, LP and FM, so far.
This pre-amp is no longer in production and is typically available for less than half its original list of $1495. When I bought it, my ideal pre-amp was an Audible Illusions, but all those ugly knobs, no remote, so I took a chance with the Parasound. Did I also tell you that along with the balanced topology comes polarity switching from the remote, and polarity does make a difference. Now where do I put my groceries?
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: David(Unregistered User)
( an Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date March 23, 1998Overall Rating
5 of 5
|
|  | |
Review 4 of 5 Summary: I am new to audiophilia and have just bought the Parasound P/LD 2000 from an internet retailer. I paid just under $800 for the piece and am EXTREMELY happy with it. I auditioned the Parasound P/SD 1500THX and the Adcom GFA-700 and found the 2000 to be far superior to both in terms of clarity, image, and accuracy. I love this pre-amp!! I have an Acurus A250 amp and a Sony ES cd changer(obviously the weak link in my system), and B&W 603s. I also am using AQ Ruby interconnects and AQ Type 4 cable. I think it sounds great thanks to the Parasound pre-amp. For less than $800 there is no better pre amp on the planet! Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jay(Unregistered User)
( a Casual Listener)
Review Date February 6, 1998Overall Rating
5 of 5
|
|  | |
Review 5 of 5 Summary: This pre-amp has recently been discontinued by Parasound. I got it for 50% ofits' original list. Nothing can touch it in that price range. I had not planned on getting a unit with balanced input and output. It also has a pair of RCAs for direct input; which presumably has less effect on the signal than the other inputs. The sound is very warm and natural sounding. I am using a SONY CDP XA20ES as the source and a Hafler P1500 power amp. The pre-amp and amp are connected via Kimber Kable Hero Balanced interconnects. Kimber PBJs from the source to the pre-amp. The set-up seems to get the most out of the KEF Q15s. The imaging is good on most recent CDs, like Fleetwood Mac's the Dance. The classical guitars on the new remastered version of Yes' Fragile, are very realistic. I am curious how the system would sound with a separate DAC. Parasound has discontinued all of their DACs, and they can be had at some very good prices. Anybody know why Parasound is discontinuing all this seemingly fine audio equipment?
|
|
|
|
|